International Journal of Advanced Engineering Application

An Examination of the Utilization of Machine Learning in Fused Deposition Modeling.

Author(s):Jayaram H.K�, Mohan R�, Mahesh Babu S�

Affiliation: Department of Mechanical Engineering ,1.2.3. Sri Venkateswara college of Engineering, Chittoor, India.

Page No: 19-23

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 1 Issue 2,June-2024

Journal: International Journal of Advanced Engineering Application (IJAEA)

ISSN NO: 3048-6807

DOI:

Download PDF

Abstract:
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a type of additive manufacturing (AM) that creates components by layering material in a sequential manner. Compared to traditional manufacturing techniques, FDM can produce complex geometries and intricate details more quickly, without the need for a fixed process plan or specialized tooling, and requires minimal human intervention. FDM parts exhibit excellent heat and chemical resistance, along with impressive strength-to-weight ratios. However, challenges remain with the consistency, reliability, and accuracy of FDM-produced parts. To ensure consistent quality and process reliability, real-time monitoring of the FDM process is essential. Recent research indicates that machine learning (ML) models offer a powerful computational approach to help AM processes achieve high-quality standards, maintain product consistency, and optimize process outcomes. Despite its potential, the integration of ML with FDM remains relatively unexplored. While existing research is limited, there is a lack of review-based studies on the application of ML in the FDM process, which could guide future research. This paper aims to fill that gap by providing a comprehensive overview of the use of ML in FDM. Keywords: Fused Deposition Modeling, Machine Learning

Keywords: Fused Deposition Modeling,Machine Learning

Reference:

• [1] Alomarah, A., Masood, S. H., Sbarski, I., Faisal, B., Gao, Z. & Ruan, D. 2020. Compressive properties of 3D printed auxetic structures: experimental and numerical studies. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 15, 1-21.
• [2] Ang, K. C., Leong, K. F., Chua, C. K. & Chandrasekaran, M. 2006. Investigation of the mechanical properties and porosity relationships in fused deposition modelling?fabricated porous structures. Rapid Prototyping Journal.
• [3] Attard, D., Farrugia, P., Gatt, R. & Grima, J. 2020. Starchirals�a novel class of auxetic hierarchal structures. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 179, 105631.
• [4] Bellehumeur, C., Bisaria, M. & Vlachopoulos, J. 1996. An experimental study and model assessment of polymer sintering. Polymer Engineering & Science, 36, 2198-2207.
• [5] Boldrin, L., Hummel, S., Scarpa, F., Di Maio, D., Lira, C., Ruzzene, M., Remillat, C. D., Lim, T.-C., Rajasekaran, R. & Patsias, S. 2016. Dynamic behaviour of auxetic gradient composite hexagonal honeycombs. Composite Structures, 149, 114-124.
• [6] Chen, L., Zhang, J., Du, B., Zhou, H., Liu, H., Guo, Y., Li, W. & Fang, D. 2018a. Dynamic crushing behavior and energy absorption of graded lattice cylindrical structure under axial impact load. Thin-Walled Structures, 127, 333-343.
• [7] Chen, Y., Li, T., Jia, Z., Scarpa, F., Yao, C.-W. & Wang, L. 2018b. 3D printed hierarchical honeycombs with shape integrity under large compressive deformations. Materials & Design, 137, 226-234.
• [8] Dave, H. K., Rajpurohit, S. R., Patadiya, N. H., Dave, S. J., Sharma, K. S., Thambad, S. S., Srinivasn, V. P. & Sheth, K. V. 2019. Compressive strength of PLA based scaffolds: effect of layer height, infill density and print speed. Int. J. Mod. Manuf. Technol., 11, 21-27.
• [9] Elipe, J. C. �. & Lantada, A. D. 2012. Comparative study of auxetic geometries by means of computer-aided design and engineering. Smart Materials and Structures, 21, 105004.
• [10] Gao, D., Sun, Q., Hu, B. & Zhang, S. 2020. A framework for agricultural pest and disease monitoring based on internet-of-things and unmanned aerial vehicles. Sensors, 20, 1487.
• [11] Hou, W., Yang, X., Zhang, W. & Xia, Y. 2018. Design of energy-dissipating structure with functionally graded auxetic cellular material. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 23, 366-376.
• [12] Ingrole, A., Hao, A. & Liang, R. 2017. Design and modeling of auxetic and hybrid honeycomb structures for in-plane property enhancement. Materials & Design, 117, 72-83.
• [13] Ituarte, I. F., Boddeti, N., Hassani, V., Dunn, M. L. & Rosen, D. W. 2019. Design and additive manufacture of functionally graded structures based on digital materials. Additive Manufacturing, 30, 100839.
• [14] Joshi, S., Ju, J., Berglind, L., Rusly, R., Summers, J. D. & Desjardins, J. D. Experimental Damage Characterization of Hexagonal Honeycombs Subjected to In-Plane Shear Loading. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2010. 35-41.
• [15] Li, X., Lu, Z., Yang, Z. & Yang, C. 2018. Anisotropic in-plane mechanical behavior of square honeycombs under off-axis loading. Materials & Design, 158, 88-97.
• [16] Lira, C., Scarpa, F. & Rajasekaran, R. 2011. A gradient cellular core for aeroengine fan blades based on auxetic configurations. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22, 907-917.
• [17] Magalh�es, L., Volpato, N. & Luersen, M. 2014. Evaluation of stiffness and strength in fused deposition sandwich specimens. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 36, 449-459.
• [18] Mccaw, J. C. & Cuan-Urquizo, E. 2020. Mechanical characterization of 3D printed, non-planar lattice structures under quasi-static cyclic loading. Rapid Prototyping Journal.
• [19] Panda, B., Leite, M., Biswal, B. B., Niu, X. & Garg, A. 2018. Experimental and numerical modelling of mechanical properties of 3D printed honeycomb structures. Measurement, 116, 495-506.
• [20] Raeisi, S., Tapkir, P., Ansari, F. & Tovar, A. 2019. Design of a hybrid honeycomb unit cell with enhanced in-plane mechanical properties.